Reminded of the great Elise Boulding today

Quote

I’m attending the Engaged Communication conference in Aspen, Colorado this weekend. During the kick off, Dr. Gregg Walker gave a great keynote about his work with collaborative learning. He included a great reference to Elise Boulding, and her work (before it was cool) on organizational connectedness.  I’ve always loved her thoughts on complexity, which reminds me to continue to resist the managerial reductionist instincts that seem to be so tightly woven into my professional affiliation.

Here it is:

“We can’t simplify the world. There’s no wand we can wave to remove the complexities
around us…  So, in a profound sense, we have to take responsibility for  living on the planet.”

I’m curious today about curiosity

For a long time now I’ve been writing about needing to change how we change – as individuals and as organizations.  Again and again I hear clients and colleagues talk about how hard it is to change. Here’s the thing. For naturally curious people, change isn’t all that hard.  One of the hardest things for me to accept in an organization is a lack of curiosity – about what could be if change happened, but also about what’s happening on the other side of the cubicle wall.  So maybe we need to think about how we foster curiosity in people, so when change comes, it isn’t quite so daunting.

Too often I encounter organizational structures where everyone is so focused on their own thing, and they let years just slip by without growing. It is the consultant that has stayed on the same account in the same type of role for 10 years, or the operations manager who runs a top notch call center but doesn’t know the company stock price, or the Sales VP who drives a world class sales organization, but isn’t really sure how the product works. It is OK to specialize, for sure, and there’s great value in it – it isn’t that these people aren’t are high performers. Their focus has value, and they easily offer 101 rationals for not knowing more about the business – not enough time, under resourced, pressure from management, leadership doesn’t model the right behavior, etc.  But at the end of the day, we can all make an individual choice to be curious about what’s happening around us. I meet people every day who haven’t learned anything new in 10 years except by happenstance – they happen to be standing around when something new hits them in the head. They are bright, energetic, hard working, and committed people – good people.  But they just don’t find ways to explore what’s going on in other parts of the world that is their company. Sometimes they don’t even know the name of the person who has been sitting  two doors down from them for years.  And we wonder why organizations struggle with collaboration, innovation, and growth.  If people aren’t curious, those things will always remain elusive.

In the last few weeks I’ve had the pleasure of working with two of my company’s largest clients and interacting with some very curious people.  Like their less curious counterparts, they are bright, energetic, hard working and committed. But they have that extra spark that makes them wonder about what could be, and they know that to visualize that, they have to be willing to learn about other parts of world around them.  Both of these clients are global, complex, and daunting, and the people I’m talking about are under resourced and over taxed by their leadership, just like everyone else. But curiosity is in their DNA, and you know it as soon as you meet them. One is in his 20s, another is in her 30s, and two are in their 40s – age doesn’t matter when it comes to being curious. And it isn’t about getting distracted or having trouble focusing – these people soak it in and apply what they learn every day to their task at hand, and they use what they take in to think critically about the problems they face in their own roles. They aren’t going around getting into other people’s business – quite the opposite.  They focus on excelling at what they do while understanding the larger context in which they exist.

Working with them over the last few weeks has reminded me of how very critical curiosity is to the success of an organization.  I want to surround myself with people who continually push themselves to learn new things, to explore what others know and do, and who put themselves in positions to do different things.  People who go to classes in random subjects, or who go spend a day in a different office just to find out what’s happening over there.  People who are curious.

When was the last time you moved yourself to a learning place?  What happened when you did?

Critical Thinking

Thank God It’s Monday!

A few years ago my friend and colleague Sam Douglass told me he knew he was in the right line of work because he was as excited for Mondays as he was for Fridays.  That always stuck with me because I felt fortunate to have the same experience.  Work isn’t always fun, but I do look forward to it for a lot of reasons.

This past week I had the pleasure of catching up with a friend and graduate school colleague, Margaret (Durfy) Murray.  She has a fantastic blog: Thank God It’s Monday that you will enjoy checking out.  Her commitment to building workplaces that are inspiring to come to and where people look forward to Monday is grounded in theory, inspired by personal experience, and informed by practical experience. I look forward to hearing about the places she goes!

I might be wrong, but I am not confused….

When I think about the most generative, productive, and fun teams I’ve ever been on, we were not perfect communicators. We did not always practice ‘appreciative inquiry’ or ‘seek first to understand’, or ‘respectfully disagree’. Sometimes we really had at it – arguing loudly (in the olden days we would have called it shouting), disagreeing directly without any carefully worded phrases about how we can ‘agree to disagree’, but flat out saying ‘you are wrong, I’m right, and here’s why’.  That created highly productive tension, where we were motivated to continue the discussion and through our disagreements, find incredibly creative and innovative new ways of thinking and doing.

When I talk to clients about creative tension, they nod and listen carefully (they have been well trained), and then with a wink and a nod say ‘yes, but respectful disagreement, right?’ or ‘managed tension, right?’  To which I want to say ‘wrong’. We have moved so much to moderate positions, to a calm, rational, respectful environment, that there is no room for passion, for the energy that comes from truly arguing with someone. When I look at companies that are struggling with “innovation”, part of what I see is a lack of passionate team members who are committed to being a team, but also to having the normal, “I am human and not always perfect” connections.  I’m at the point where when someone gently says to me “I think you must be confused” when what they really mean is that they disagree with me.  I look them straight in the eye and say “I might be wrong, but I am not confused.”  In other words, don’t be afraid to challenge me, to say that you think I’m wrong. I’d prefer that to someone avoiding confrontation by suggesting that I’m somehow addled in my thinking.

Sometimes the things that stitch teams together the most are those moments of incredible challenge, where someone has had a complete meltdown, and the team needs to figure out how to pull itself together and move on.  Those are the moments that form us – not the polite niceness of communication via communications training templates.  Think about the best teams you’ve been on – best meaning most productive, innovative, and interesting. Were they always perfect?  Were there moments of complete disarray?  Were there sometimes very upset people?  I’m willing to be there were. Interpersonal distress creates great bonds that tie people together for a lot of reasons.

Don’t get me wrong, I don’t think we should go to a work environment full of angry, disrespectful people. I’m a fan of appreciative inquiry, crucial conversation templates, and other devices that help us to get our points across in moderated ways. But I also think that we need room to sometimes let things slip, to be a little organic and messy, and to express our passion in less than perfect ways.  Not all the time, but at times for sure.

Management folks seem to think there is some terrifyingly slippery slope in this way – that one moment of passion will lead to chaos in the workplace, or tyrant behavior, or mass hysteria. So they punish people who get out of line – sometimes quickly and harshly, rather than investigating what is driving their passion and figuring out how to leverage it to create productive tension.  But a calm, moderated workplace produces mostly calm, moderate results, and most companies with whom I work are looking for exuberant results – growth, innovation, market share, etc.  That seems incommensurate to me.

Required versus wanting too – why should employees come to work?

Yahoo continues to combat the bad press it is receiving since mandating that employees show up at the office.  Under vague references to inspiring people, creating collaboration opportunities and so forth, they seem to miss the point. If you create a compelling, collaborative, and energizing environment, people will show up because not being there feels like a loss.  And they wlil work from home when they need the mind-space to produce, or when they need to balance their work schedules with home / personal requirements, whatever those might be.  But if “the office” physically is attractive enough, they will find ways to show up, instead of marching in under orders.

So the question to Yahoo shouldn’t be why have so many people been working from home, instead it should be why haven’t they been coming to work?  And the answer probably isn’t because they were allowed to, or they weren’t required to…..more likely it is because there wasn’t a rewarding experience for which they felt compelled to show up.