Yesterday I wrote about expertise as either common or differentiated. One way to think about it is through the lens of the Resource Based View (RBV) of the firm theory. RBV gives us four attributes of a strategic asset. The asset must be Valuable, Rare, Inimitable, and Non-substitutable (the VRIN attributes) to be a strategic asset that can sustain a competitive advantage.
Common expertise (in consulting I would call that project management, change management, process work, and traditional strategy work) is Valuable. It is possibly Inimitable, but with the plethora of templates and other resources available these days, that’s arguable. It is not, however, Rare. As for Non-substitutable, that probably depends on the problem being solved.
Differentiated expertise is Rare, less open to Imitation, and more prone to being Non-substitutable. The question is…. how Valuable is it? Its value is market sensitive – there have to be clients who need it. And over time, it may become less Rare and easier to substitute.
Consulting companies are challenged to maintain both types of expertise in their resources, and to recognize that while everyone might be an expert, not everyone has (or needs to have) differentiated expertise. Investing in and maintaining a diverse knowledge pool as an asset requires thinking about these things differently.